Open letter to the Presidents of the EU Institutions and the Heads of State and Government of the EU

  • June 12, 2015

June 12, 2015 - "Defence matters" - this bold statement opened the December 2013 Conclusions of the European Council, which launched numerous initiatives to strengthen the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). At the end of this month, Heads of State and Government will review progress on these iniatives. 

A few weeks ahead of the Summit, it is clear the European defence budgets remain severely constrained, and that Member States' armed forces are struggling to retain effectiveness and coherence. This had serious consequences for Europe's military capabilities and the long-term future of the industrial and technological basis which underpins CSDP. At a time when the security environment in our neighbourhood is deteriorating, Europe is losing important elements of its capacity to defend its interests and its citizens. 

Since progress has been so modest, political guidances for the future becomes even more important. In June, Heads of State and Government should raise the level of ambition and give to EU institutions and Member States concrete tasks for the way ahead. 

From the perspective of industry, the following areas should become priorities: 

Europe must ensure an appropriate level of strategic autonomy, rather than accepting greater dependence on off-shore allies. Therefore, it is vital to reach a common understanding of the technological capabilities which should be maintained collectively. The European Council should task Member States to prepare together a defence industrial strategy which identifies technology gaps and priorities and how to address them. The EU should support and complement this strategy through related policies and instruments. 

After years of decline, a rapid and substantial increase in investment in defence research is needed, given its pivotal role in maintaining the technological edge that ensures military advantage. The European Council should set minimum targets for investmnet in national and collaboration R&T projects. Moreover, it should support the plan for an EU defence research programme substantital enough to make a difference. 

To generate new capabilities and strengthen Europen industry, investments in R&T must lead to concrete procurement projects. The European Council should call upon Member States to develop European solutions for those critical capabilities which underpin Europe's strategic autonomy. 

Since no Members States can afford to sustain a full range of defence industrial capabilities on a purely national basis, it is essential that more new equipment development programmes are set up in cooperation. To achieve this, the European Council should task Members States to harmonise their requirements, align their procurement plans, strive for standardisation and mutual recognition of certification. At the EU-level, financial incentives should be set to forster collaboration programmes. 

Security of Supply is vital for both our armes forces and the functioning of the internal market for defence. The European Council should decide to establish an EU-wide system of free circulation of defence equiment for the end-use by Member States' armed forces. Once the sale of an equipment to another Member State is authorised, the selling Member State should commit itself not to block follow-on deliveries for in-service support for that equipment. 

Also small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) need to have a fair chance to benefit from the internal market for defence. Having the opportunity to compete on a level playing field is necessary for all companies in all Member States to thrive and retain the competencies needed to support Member States' essential security interests. The European Council should therefore task the European Commission and Member States to prepare concrete actions that help to facilitate cross-border access for European SMEs to European defence supply chains. 

Some of these proposals may seem ambitious, but we believe that none of them is unrealistic. All of them would take some time to produce tangible results, but this should not hinder Members States and Government from kick-starting them now and establishing concrete timelines and milestones to measure progress. This would ensure that the European Council of June raises the ambition of European defence to the level which is needed to make a difference. 

On behalf of ASD Board Members,

Mauro Moretti, ASD President, CEO Finmeccanica 
Jan Pie, ASD Secretary General